netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Netfilter+IPsec

To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Netfilter+IPsec
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:43:40 -0800
Cc: herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <42424AAE.9080403@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <20050214221607.GC18465@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050306213214.7d8a143d.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050307103536.GB7137@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050308102741.GA23468@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050314102614.GA9610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050314105313.GA21001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050314111002.GA29156@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050315091904.GA6256@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050315095837.GA7130@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050318090310.GA28443@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050318091129.GA28658@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050318104013.57d65e99.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <423D9ADA.6050407@xxxxxxxxx> <20050322194910.6a9fa3a4.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4240EA78.5050402@xxxxxxxxx> <42424AAE.9080403@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 06:05:50 +0100
Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This patch (not entirely reviewed myself yet) contains the parts
> necessary for hooking output IPsec packets for netfilter.

This is actually much cleaner than I had ever anticipated.
I like it.

I suppose the input side will be quite a bit more involved?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>