| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? |
| From: | Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:40:36 +0100 (MET) |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1111583497.1089.92.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <E1DE44X-0001QM-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111581618.1088.72.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050323125516.GP3086@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111583497.1089.92.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
>I have seen people put little comments of "kfree will work if you >pass it NULL" - are you saying such assumptions exist all over >net/sched? Not only net/sched. The C standard requires that free(NULL) works. Jan Engelhardt -- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c?, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c?, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c?, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c?, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |