| To: | Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 7/7] netpoll: avoid kfree_skb on packets with destructo |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:35:21 -0800 |
| Cc: | jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050303213228.GU3120@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <7.454130102@xxxxxxxxxxx> <8.454130102@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20050303130031.066f0862.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050303213228.GU3120@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 13:32:28 -0800 Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Doh. Plain as day. How's this look? > > Packets that have destructors should not be zapped here as that might > produce additional printk warnings via netconsole. > > Signed-off-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> Looks great Matt, applied. Thanks. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/6] netpoll: recursion fixes, queueing, and cleanups, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] netpoll carrier clarification, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 7/7] netpoll: avoid kfree_skb on packets with destructo, Matt Mackall |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/7] netpoll: shorten carrier detect timeout, Patrick McHardy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |