netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Infrahip] [PATCH] Host Identity Protocol

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Infrahip] [PATCH] Host Identity Protocol
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:03:56 -0800
Cc: miika@xxxxxx, gurtov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, infrahip@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050321.024241.67451836.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <42369919.9010203@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0503201805240.1521@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050321.024241.67451836.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 02:42:41 +0900 (JST)
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> However, all signaling should be handled in userspace as we (will) do for 
> MIP6.

Yes, I've been telling them similarly in a private
email discussion.  I'm very glad someone else says
this too, so I don't appear as the only person who
feels this way :-)
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH 3/5] TCP Westwood+ support, Andrew Morton
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH 3/5] TCP Westwood+ support, Andrew Morton
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Infrahip] [PATCH] Host Identity Protocol, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
Next by Thread:  Re: [Infrahip] [PATCH] Host Identity Protocol, Miika Komu
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]