| To: | Max Krasnyansky <maxk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] remove unused netlink NL_EMULATE_DEV code |
| From: | Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Mar 2005 17:02:53 -0800 |
| Cc: | Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <423B6DAE.9050803@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050318233637.GS5389@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <423B6DAE.9050803@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6i |
* Max Krasnyansky (maxk@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Why don't you kill Ethertap completely while you're at it. Ethertap needs > "Netlink device emulation" > stuff. And this whole thing has been marked OBSOLETE for more than two > years now. > Most projects seem to have switched to TUN/TAP long time ago. I'd prefer that too. What about the netlink_dev implementation itself? Should it be marked obsolete? thanks, -chris |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] TCP Hybla, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, Andy Furniss |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] remove unused netlink NL_EMULATE_DEV code, Max Krasnyansky |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] remove unused netlink NL_EMULATE_DEV code, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |