| To: | davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [12/*] [IPSEC] Handle local_df in IPv4 |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Mar 2005 03:28:20 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050316.032537.72822422.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <20050314102614.GA9610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050314212557.23f0ab09.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050316.032537.72822422.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <20050316.032537.72822422.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Wed, 16 Mar 2005 03:25:37 +0900 (JST)), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says: > > > that we don't have any local_df support over there. That is, we > > > always fragment outbound UDP/raw packets. Did I miss something? > > > > I have no idea offhand. Perhaps Yoshifuji can figure it out? > > Currently, yes. I mean: we always fragment outbount UDP/raw packets. --yoshfuji |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [12/*] [IPSEC] Handle local_df in IPv4, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [17/*] [NET] Replace dst_pmtu with dst_mtu, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [12/*] [IPSEC] Handle local_df in IPv4, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [4/4] [IPSEC] Store MTU at each xfrm_dst, Patrick McHardy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |