Re: [PATCH] bridge: no update when hold time is zero

netdev

Re: [PATCH] bridge: no update when hold time is zero

To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] bridge: no update when hold time is zero
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 14 Mar 2005 21:40:22 -0800
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20050311102636.30934f12@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20050310154437.1223b6e9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050310185152.12ed9819.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050311102636.30934f12@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:26:36 -0800
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Some users, set hold time to zero on bridge so it always does
> flooding. This is usually when using it with wireless.  The new RCU
> based code changed the behaviour so the bridge would not flood for
> one GC interval. This patch restores the original behaviour.

Applied, thanks Stephen.

Please don't forget the signed-off-by line next time :-)

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] (4/4) bridge: forwarding table lockless update, Stephen Hemminger Re: [PATCH] (4/4) bridge: forwarding table lockless update, David S. Miller [PATCH] bridge: no update when hold time is zero, Stephen Hemminger Re: [PATCH] bridge: no update when hold time is zero, David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: More IPSEC trouble, David S. Miller
Next by Date:	Re: tg3 kernel oops when setting flow control while interface is down (2.6.10), David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH] bridge: no update when hold time is zero, Stephen Hemminger
Next by Thread:	[PATCH] optimize is_valid_ether_addr, Stephen Hemminger
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]