| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [12/*] [IPSEC] Handle local_df in IPv4 |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Mar 2005 21:25:57 -0800 |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050314102614.GA9610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050214221006.GA18415@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050214221200.GA18465@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050214221433.GB18465@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050214221607.GC18465@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050306213214.7d8a143d.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050307103536.GB7137@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050308102741.GA23468@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050314102614.GA9610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 21:26:14 +1100 Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > When cleaning up the remaining users of dst_pmtu I noticed that > local_df wasn't being treated correctly in IPsec. In fact, if > you socket's dst went over IPsec, local_df is essentailly ignored. > > This patch fixes that. > > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Applied, thanks Herbert. > I was going to do the same thing to IPv6. Unfortunately it seems > that we don't have any local_df support over there. That is, we > always fragment outbound UDP/raw packets. Did I miss something? I have no idea offhand. Perhaps Yoshifuji can figure it out? |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] [IPV6] Use dev_get_flags() while building inet6 ifinfo message, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [13/*] [IPV4] Fix room calculation in icmp_send, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [13/*] [IPV4] Fix room calculation in icmp_send, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [12/*] [IPSEC] Handle local_df in IPv4, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |