| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: More IPSEC trouble |
| From: | Steve Hill <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Mar 2005 12:12:27 +0000 (GMT) |
| Cc: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050312013515.GA17539@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <E1D9Ymg-0001x0-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503111453320.18067@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42323125.20706@xxxxxxxxx> <20050312013515.GA17539@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Herbert Xu wrote: Since tunnel_check_size only looks at the state to determine whether it's tunnel mode, it doesn't need to hold the lock at all. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I can confirm this fixes the problem - tested under 2.6.10. - Steve Hill (BSc) Senior Software Developer Email: steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx Navaho Technologies Ltd. Tel: +44-870-7034015 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [3/4] [IPSEC] Add route element to xfrm_dst, Patrick McHardy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Link detection, Hasso Tepper |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: More IPSEC trouble, Patrick McHardy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: More IPSEC trouble, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |