Re: [06/11] [TCP]: Put back tcp_timer_bug

netdev

Re: [06/11] [TCP]: Put back tcp_timer_bug_msg[] symbol export.

To:	Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [06/11] [TCP]: Put back tcp_timer_bug_msg[] symbol export.
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 10 Mar 2005 23:20:14 +0000
Cc:	davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20050310230843.GG22112@xxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxx
References:	<20050310230519.GA22112@xxxxxxxxx> <20050310230843.GG22112@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c    2005-03-09 17:20:38 -08:00
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c    2005-03-09 17:20:38 -08:00
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>  
>  #ifdef TCP_DEBUG
>  const char tcp_timer_bug_msg[] = KERN_DEBUG "tcpbug: unknown timer value\n";
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_timer_bug_msg);
>  #endif

not complaining about putting this into -stable, but why do people have
TCP_DEBUG turned on for normal builds?

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[06/11] [TCP]: Put back tcp_timer_bug_msg[] symbol export., Greg KH Re: [06/11] [TCP]: Put back tcp_timer_bug_msg[] symbol export., Christoph Hellwig <= Re: [06/11] [TCP]: Put back tcp_timer_bug_msg[] symbol export., David S. Miller

Previous by Date:	Re: RFC: PHY Abstraction Layer II, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Next by Date:	[PATCH] netpoll carrier clarification, Matt Mackall
Previous by Thread:	[06/11] [TCP]: Put back tcp_timer_bug_msg[] symbol export., Greg KH
Next by Thread:	Re: [06/11] [TCP]: Put back tcp_timer_bug_msg[] symbol export., David S. Miller
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]