| To: | <dtor_core@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing) |
| From: | "Steve Iribarne" <steve.iribarne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:04:02 -0800 |
| Cc: | "Catalin\(ux aka Dino\) BOIE" <util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Martin Mares" <mj@xxxxxx>, "Zdenek Radouch" <zdenek@xxxxxxx>, "Eran Mann" <emann@xxxxxxx>, "Thomas Graf" <tgraf@xxxxxxx>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcUlgGSO02N6ZKmLSaSD9JNB4kmuuwAAUcOw |
| Thread-topic: | Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing) |
-> This assumes that the client did not apply the same hack you did. -> They wouldn't do it on the same machine or system. I control my internal system. It's an embedded system which means I have complete control. If they applied it somewhere else on the network, I wouldn't receive any of those packets because the router would drop it and my patch drops the 127.xxx rcv'd packets if not received on the proper VLAN and my system doesn't accept tagged packets from the outside world. I don't think I'm the only one who has done this. As a matter of fact, I KNOW I'm not. When I worked on BSD years ago (10+), I worked for a company who did the same sort of hack. -stv |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: More IPSEC trouble, Nicolas DICHTEL |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), Dmitry Torokhov |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |