| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [3/4] [IPSEC] Add route element to xfrm_dst |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 7 Mar 2005 21:02:09 +1100 |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050306212800.43d3d42e.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050214221006.GA18415@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050214221200.GA18465@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050214221433.GB18465@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050306212800.43d3d42e.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 09:28:00PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > I guess this back traversal list makes it impossible for us > to share xfrm_dst's for multiple unique flows even if that > could be possible, right? I used the back traversal only because it was convenient. There is nothing fundamental about it. So if we ever implemented xdst sharing, we could easily modify the couple of functions involved to walk the bundle forward and then in reverse. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [patch 1/1] atalk build fix, akpm |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [IPSEC] Kill redundan dst_release check in xfrm_dst_destroy, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [3/4] [IPSEC] Add route element to xfrm_dst, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [3/4] [IPSEC] Add route element to xfrm_dst, Patrick McHardy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |