| To: | domen@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch 01/26] list_for_each: net-ipv6-ip6_fib.c |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 07 Mar 2005 01:40:40 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, janitor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050306103238.86F181E46E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <20050306103238.86F181E46E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <20050306103238.86F181E46E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Sun, 06 Mar 2005
11:32:38 +0100), domen@xxxxxxxxxxxx says:
> s/for/list_for_each/
> Compile tested.
:
> +++ kj-domen/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c 2005-03-05 16:09:09.000000000 +0100
> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ struct fib6_walker_t fib6_walker_list =
> .next = &fib6_walker_list,
> };
>
> -#define FOR_WALKERS(w) for ((w)=fib6_walker_list.next; (w) !=
> &fib6_walker_list; (w)=(w)->next)
> +#define FOR_WALKERS(w) list_for_each((w), &fib6_walker_list)
>
> static __inline__ u32 fib6_new_sernum(void)
> {
Please don't. fib6_walker_list is not for fib6_walker_t but list_head.
(Or, why don't you convert fib6_walker_t to use list_head families?)
--yoshfuji
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: (usagi-users 03249) Re: support of IPv6 by NFS, Jeroen Massar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Vanilla kernel >=2.4.28-rc2 incompatibility with ADSL modem Dlink DSL-G300+, Alessandro Selli |
| Previous by Thread: | [patch 01/26] list_for_each: net-ipv6-ip6_fib.c, domen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch 01/26] list_for_each: net-ipv6-ip6_fib.c, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |