| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] [NET]: Fix deletion of local addresses only varying in prefix length |
| From: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 05 Mar 2005 02:11:20 +0100 |
| Cc: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050305010319.GB27804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050304012003.GA31837@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1D78DN-0002te-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050304131419.GE31837@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050304233212.GA27421@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050305002910.GJ31837@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42290172.7020403@xxxxxxxxx> <20050305010319.GB27804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050106 Debian/1.7.5-1 |
Herbert Xu wrote: On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 01:46:42AM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:I think that would be ok. Unrelated to this: for IFA_ADDRESS we don't do an exact match, perhaps we should also do this for IFA_LOCAL for consistency.You mean that we do do an exact match for IFA_ADDRESS? No, I meant that IFA_ADDRESS matches on exact prefixlen, but uses inet_ifa_match() for comparing the addresses. In any case we should keep the behaviour that no given prefix is a wildcard, but if a prefix is given we could do something similar as for IFA_ADDRESS. Regards Patrick |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] [NET]: Fix deletion of local addresses only varying in prefix length, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] [NET]: Fix deletion of local addresses only varying in prefix length, Thomas Graf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] [NET]: Fix deletion of local addresses only varying in prefix length, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] [NET]: Fix deletion of local addresses only varying in prefix length, Thomas Graf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |