| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 7/7] netpoll: avoid kfree_skb on packets with destructo |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Mar 2005 13:29:06 -0800 |
| Cc: | mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <42277ED6.4020707@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <7.454130102@xxxxxxxxxxx> <8.454130102@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20050303130031.066f0862.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42277ED6.4020707@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 16:17:10 -0500 Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Heh, I was just writing this same message. > > On a related note... David, I would prefer if you merged up the netpoll > stuff, since it touches mainly net/* > > Is that cool w/ you? No problem. I still don't like this code in that it adds a locking penalty to everyone just by virtue of enabling netpoll. We've worked so hard with things like NETIF_F_LLTX to eliminate locking, so this would be a huge step backwards. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping, Baruch Even |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 7/7] netpoll: avoid kfree_skb on packets with destructo, Matt Mackall |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 7/7] netpoll: avoid kfree_skb on packets with destructo, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 7/7] netpoll: avoid kfree_skb on packets with destructo, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |