| To: | tgraf@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ip -6 addr flush dev <device> flushes also the autogenerated link-local address |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 03 Mar 2005 09:00:09 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx, usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050302231400.GU31837@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <001C540DBA8D9308CA5D790F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1109801372.1098.228.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050302231400.GU31837@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <20050302231400.GU31837@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 3 Mar 2005 00:14:00 +0100), Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> says: > * jamal <1109801372.1098.228.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-02 17:09 > > > > Is this a user space problem? I think we had something along these lines > > fixed recently. Thomas? > > I didn't fix any of these but it's definitely a userspace problem. > One can easly work around this by iterating over all scopes > except for link local and provide the scope to flush. We'll have > to put additional filters into print_addrinfo() if we want this > to be default but I'm not even sure what the official policy should > be like. Any standards on this? I believe that flush should remove all addresses including link-local. So, current behavior is correct. --yoshfuji |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ip -6 addr flush dev <device> flushes also the autogenerated link-local address, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Interconnect virtual device?, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ip -6 addr flush dev <device> flushes also the autogenerated link-local address, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ip -6 addr flush dev <device> flushes also the autogenerated link-local address, Peter Bieringer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |