[Top] [All Lists]

Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement

To: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 23:03:49 +0100
Cc: Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Remus <rmocius@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Nguyen Dinh Nam <nguyendinhnam@xxxxxxxxx>, Andre Tomt <andre@xxxxxxxx>,, Damion de Soto <damion@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1111787325.1092.690.camel@jzny.localdomain>
References: <1111663947.1037.24.camel@jzny.localdomain> <1111665450.1037.27.camel@jzny.localdomain> <> <1111749220.1092.457.camel@jzny.localdomain> <> <1111781443.1092.631.camel@jzny.localdomain> <> <1111783686.1089.661.camel@jzny.localdomain> <> <1111787325.1092.690.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
* jamal <1111787325.1092.690.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-25 16:48
> On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 16:01, Thomas Graf wrote:
> > * jamal <1111783686.1089.661.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-25 15:48
> > I can enqueue it to the following working queue, won't be dequeued
> > for quite a while though.
> >  resolve an open htb+gred issue
> What is the issue with htb+gred?

Remember your change to gred where you fixed a bug reported
by stanford checker? I have two reports that this broke things
for HTB+GRED although the change looks ok to me and is definitely

> >  libnl + netconfig release
> Are you working with the netconfig code thats out there?

I did not receive a reply from the original author of the
code but I'm using it as a base. I simply imported the code
into netconfig and changed it to use libnl for now. I left
the ioctl there so it should be easy to have a compile flag
to get back to ioctl.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>