[Top] [All Lists]

Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement

To: Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 21 Mar 2005 22:31:03 -0500
Cc: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Remus <rmocius@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Nguyen Dinh Nam <nguyendinhnam@xxxxxxxxx>, Andre Tomt <andre@xxxxxxxx>,, Damion de Soto <damion@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
Organization: jamalopolous
References: <1107123123.8021.80.camel@jzny.localdomain> <0fcf01c5077f$579e4b80$6e69690a@RIMAS> <1107174142.8021.121.camel@jzny.localdomain> <00c301c524b4$938cd240$6e69690a@RIMAS> <1110379135.1091.143.camel@jzny.localdomain> <1110416767.1111.76.camel@jzny.localdomain> <025501c52552$2dbf87c0$6e69690a@RIMAS> <1110453757.1108.87.camel@jzny.localdomain> <> <1111410890.1092.195.camel@jzny.localdomain> <> <1111444869.1072.51.camel@jzny.localdomain> <>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks for all your efforts.
I will be back on my regular setup by tommorow evening and should be
able to hopefuly test this. I am going to try:

- latest iproute2 with 1.3.x ipt changes
- i am just gonna jump to iptables 1.3.x - we are going to ignore 1.2.11
and below 
- kernel patches with stats

Issues seen so far - the following dont work:

a) tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \
match u32 0 0 flowid 1:1 action ipt -j MARK --set-mark
[Actually did you test this?]

b) above with mirred as the next action fails in user space

c) a) with a simple "action ok" is also rejected by the kernel
with "Invalid argument"

Did i miss anything else?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>