| To: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] r8169: RTL8169_registers clean-up |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Feb 2005 21:30:17 -0500 |
| Cc: | Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050228195958.GB8186@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050228190444.GA13415@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050228195958.GB8186@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922 |
Francois Romieu wrote: Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx> :An attempt to clean-up RTL8169_registers and RTL8169_register_content. Adjusted tab alignment and converted decimal values to hex. Applies cleanly to linux-2.6.11-rc4-mm1 and tested on amd64 You can do a "diff -b" (ignore whitespaces changes) to check this sort of stuff. Jeff, how am I supposed to handle cleanups now ? Just say no ? :o) Ideally keep a stack of patches such that, the fixes can be applied underneath the cleanups...
Jeff
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] WAN drivers fix: N2, C101, PCI200SYN - quite fatal, Krzysztof Halasa |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: filtering packtes before OS takes care about them, Asim Shankar |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] r8169: RTL8169_registers clean-up, Francois Romieu |
| Next by Thread: | Understanding the reason for placing a tcp_sock on stack in tcp network functions, Stephen Torri |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |