| To: | Leonid Grossman <leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Intel and TOE in the news |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 21 Feb 2005 12:11:20 -0500 |
| Cc: | "'Andi Kleen'" <ak@xxxxxx>, "'rick jones'" <rick.jones2@xxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, "'Alex Aizman'" <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200502211653.j1LGr3DD025897@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <200502211653.j1LGr3DD025897@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 11:52, Leonid Grossman wrote: > > WRT to the burst of packets related to the same flow - we are hoping to be > able to collapse the burst into a single oversized frame and pass it to the > stack, this way no or very minimal changes to the stack will be needed. > There is enough intelligence on the NIC to do that efficiently, we just need > to try and see how well this works. Indeed, would be nice to see what you come up with. I think there may be value in sending one huge chunk packet which itself is actually a collection of several independet packets when you have a huge amount of small packets. The benefit being you amortize the cost of DMA setup. But then you may need to be able to break them down in the driver; is this what you are talking about? cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Intel and TOE in the news, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: many outgoing tcp sockets are slower than a few, Christian Schmid |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Intel and TOE in the news, Leonid Grossman |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Intel and TOE in the news, Leonid Grossman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |