| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Intel and TOE in the news |
| From: | Eugene Surovegin <ebs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 20 Feb 2005 08:46:07 -0800 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <m1psywb8i4.fsf@xxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <4216B62D.6000502@xxxxxxxxx> <20050219041007.GA17896@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050219114624.373af63f.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <m1psywb8i4.fsf@xxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.5.1i |
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 09:27:31PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > <speculating freely> > > It would be nice if the NIC could asynchronously trigger prefetches in > the CPU. Currently a lot of the packet processing cost goes > to waiting for read cache misses. Just FYI :), Freescale 85xx TSECs can prefetch buffers into L2 cache. IIRC they call it buffer "stashing" and gianfar driver has a config option to enable such behavior. But in embedded world you usually don't see flashy PR releases for such features :). -- Eugene. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: The 8169 driver: issue with cross cable, Willy Gardiol |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/3] r8169: code clean-up, Richard Dawe |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Intel and TOE in the news, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Intel and TOE in the news, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |