| To: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] pktgen: reduce stack usage |
| From: | "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:20:40 -0800 |
| Cc: | robert.olsson@xxxxxxxxx, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050218221121.GA22845@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | OSDL |
| References: | <20050218134219.3f079110.rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> <20050218221121.GA22845@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) |
Francois Romieu wrote: Randy.Dunlap <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> :(resend) Any comments this time?Did I miss a simultaneous use of both buffers or could it be possible to save an extra IP_NAME_SZ bytes of data with an evil ugly union ? That's probably doable, I'll double-check it and modify the patch... Btw, does anyone intend to fix the use of sleepable functions in proc_thread_write() with spinlock ("thread_lock") held or shouldI allocate it some cycles ? -- ~Randy |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] pktgen: reduce stack usage, Francois Romieu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 4223] New: sis900 kernel oop at boot, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] pktgen: reduce stack usage, Francois Romieu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] pktgen: reduce stack usage, Randy.Dunlap |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |