| To: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [XFRM]: Always reroute in tunnel mode |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:11:22 -0800 |
| Cc: | herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <42152283.4030800@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4214381F.5020507@xxxxxxxxx> <20050217113654.GA10346@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4214DF5B.3010608@xxxxxxxxx> <20050217203805.GA4047@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42150B36.5080609@xxxxxxxxx> <20050217221031.GA4554@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42152283.4030800@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:02:27 +0100 Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >Well we'll have to disagree on that. IMHO the flow with the internal > >addresses equal to the external addresses over a tunnel mode SA should > >be treated the same as that over a transport mode SA. > > Maybe Dave can help resolve this with a third opinion. I have to side with Patrick on this one. This is one of the fundamental tunnel behavior differences between Transport mode and Tunnel mode SAs. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Some query on ingress policing, Asim Shankar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPsec xfrm resolution, Patrick McHardy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [XFRM]: Always reroute in tunnel mode, Patrick McHardy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [XFRM]: Always reroute in tunnel mode, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |