| To: | Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:50:04 -0800 |
| Cc: | shemminger@xxxxxxxx, hubert.tonneau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, niv@xxxxxxxxxx, rick.jones2@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050216091323.GA26758@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <0525M9211@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050211150420.74737b2e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050215152354.46a08d77.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050216091323.GA26758@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:13:23 +0300 Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > BTW it is still a puzzle why 2.6.9 works. With disabled TSO it should > insert PSHs quite rarely, similarly to tso. Yes. Hubert, do you have netfilter enabled in the 2.6.10 kernel you are running? I'm asking because the TCP changes in 2.6.10 are pretty benign (attached for the curious who want to review along), whereas netfilter had major updates particularly in the TCP connection tracking code. I also reviewed 2.6.10-ac11 for anything interesting wrt. TCP and the only thing in there is the tcp_retrans_try_collapse() missing check to avoid collapsing TSO segments.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Question about Linux routing - ip_route_output_key vs fib_lookup, Megh Bhatt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 2.4 NETLINK]: Unhash sockets correctly, Patrick McHardy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch, Alexey Kuznetsov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch, Hubert Tonneau |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |