| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [IPV4] Make loopback idev stick around |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:41:21 -0800 |
| Cc: | yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050205053532.GA17474@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050205053030.GA17412@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050205053532.GA17474@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 16:35:32 +1100 Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 04:30:30PM +1100, herbert wrote: > > > > As it is when loopback_dev loses all of its IPv4 addresses its > > corresponding idev will be destroyed. Unfortunately as of last > > August route.c relies on the loopback idev to kill references > > to other idev objects. > > The same problem exists for IPv6. > > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Both patches applied to the 2.6.12-pending tree. I wish ->notifier_call()'s value was actually checked, we could do intelligent things instead of panic()'ing when (for example) loopback's idev allocation fails. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 2/2] ipvs deadlock fix, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH net-drivers-2.6 9/10] e1000: Fixes related to Cable length, Malli Chilakala |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [IPV4] Make loopback idev stick around, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [IPV4] Make loopback idev stick around, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |