[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch

To: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:08:17 -0800
Cc: rick.jones2@xxxxxx, hubert.tonneau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <420D3B17.3040506@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <0525M9211@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <420D37A3.6020209@xxxxxx> <420D3B17.3040506@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:09:11 -0800
Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Er, how is this compliant with 2581 (yes, I know, it's only
> a SHOULD, not a MUST)  - an ACK should be generated for at
> least every second full-sized segment received?

It's compliant but stupid.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>