| To: | Einar Lück <lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipv4 routing: multipath with cache support, 2.6.10-rc3 |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:17:10 -0800 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <420A75BF.1080106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <41C6B54F.2020604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050202172333.4d0ad5f0.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <420A1011.1030602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050209120157.18dc75c1.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <420A715D.7050106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050209123004.2d65e1cf.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <420A75BF.1080106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 21:42:39 +0100 Einar Lück <lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We considered the routing case: in the routing case ip_route_input is called. > In this case we just select the first route in the cache which is always the > same > (we ensure that). Consequently, the routing behaviour is not changed in this > case and > remains in the way you like it. Indeed. You're right. Let me re-review your second patch with this new understanding in mind :-) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.11-rc2 hangs on bridge shutdown (br0), Andre Tomt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Add audit uid to netlink credentials, Chris Wright |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipv4 routing: multipath with cache support, 2.6.10-rc3, Einar Lück |
| Next by Thread: | TCP-Protection is really a pain..., Christian Schmid |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |