| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-atm-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Linux-ATM-General] [RFC][PATCH] Very basic sysfs support for ATM devices (updated) |
| From: | Roman Kagan <rkagan@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:45:47 +0300 |
| In-reply-to: | <200502081502.j18F2ITI010672@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Roman Kagan <rkagan@xxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-atm-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20050206191918.GA2369@katya> <200502081502.j18F2ITI010672@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.7i |
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 10:02:19AM -0500, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote: > >it is, maybe we shouldn't create an atm-specific user-visible interface > >in sysfs and hotplug which is going to be obsoleted by the net generic > >one in the near future? > > with sysfs support the only thing left to 'fix' would be splitting of > allocation/registration. I beg your pardon, but are you saying that you've changed your mind re. moving to net_device? Is your plan now to cast in stone that ATM devices live under class/atm in sysfs, and go ahead with splitting of allocation/registration of the current atm_dev? Roman. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] ieee80211 subsystem, James Ketrenos |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] ieee80211 subsystem, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Linux-ATM-General] [RFC][PATCH] Very basic sysfs support for ATM devices (updated), chas williams - CONTRACTOR |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Linux-ATM-General] [RFC][PATCH] Very basic sysfs support for ATM devices (updated), Duncan Sands |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |