[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.11-rc2 hangs on bridge shutdown (br0)

To: herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.11-rc2 hangs on bridge shutdown (br0)
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 19:50:39 +0900 (JST)
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mirko.parthey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050205064643.GA29758@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <20050205061110.GA18275@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050204221344.247548cb.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050205064643.GA29758@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article <20050205064643.GA29758@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Sat, 5 Feb 2005 
17:46:43 +1100), Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:

> If we wanted to preserve the split device semantics, then we
> can create a local GC list in IPv6 so that it can search based
> on rt6i_idev as well as the other keys.  Alternatively we can
> remove the dst->dev == dev check in dst_dev_event and dst_ifdown
> and move that test down to the individual ifdown functions.

Yes, IPv6 needs "split device" semantics
(for per-device statistics such as Ip6InDelivers etc),
and I like later solution.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>