| To: | herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.11-rc2 hangs on bridge shutdown (br0) |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 05 Feb 2005 19:50:39 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mirko.parthey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050205064643.GA29758@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <20050205061110.GA18275@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050204221344.247548cb.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050205064643.GA29758@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <20050205064643.GA29758@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:46:43 +1100), Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says: > If we wanted to preserve the split device semantics, then we > can create a local GC list in IPv6 so that it can search based > on rt6i_idev as well as the other keys. Alternatively we can > remove the dst->dev == dev check in dst_dev_event and dst_ifdown > and move that test down to the individual ifdown functions. Yes, IPv6 needs "split device" semantics (for per-device statistics such as Ip6InDelivers etc), and I like later solution. Thanks. --yoshfuji |
| Previous by Date: | Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.11-rc2 hangs on bridge shutdown (br0), Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.11-rc2 hangs on bridge shutdown (br0), Andre Tomt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.11-rc2 hangs on bridge shutdown (br0), Andre Tomt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.11-rc2 hangs on bridge shutdown (br0), Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |