| To: | Olaf Hering <olh@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: limited number if iptable rules on 64bit hosts |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:00:49 -0800 |
| Cc: | okir@xxxxxxx, brugolsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050203185928.GA22832@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050202133851.GA9680@xxxxxxx> <20050202222516.GA15440@xxxxxxx> <20050202223853.GA29237@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050202225258.GA15563@xxxxxxx> <20050203111939.GI31570@xxxxxxx> <20050203104822.05be3281.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050203185928.GA22832@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:59:28 +0100 Olaf Hering <olh@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, David S. Miller wrote: > > > The rule itself is replicated per-cpu as well to keep L2 cache > > accesses local per cpu on SMP systems. > > Andy made this change, which helped on a dual box. It might not help for Olaf's 128 cpu box though :-) I think reconsider the idea of replicating the rule itself per-cpu. Also, this thread should have begun with netfilter-devel at least on the CC:, added. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: limited number if iptable rules on 64bit hosts, Olaf Hering |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: limited number if iptable rules on 64bit hosts, Bart De Schuymer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: limited number if iptable rules on 64bit hosts, Olaf Hering |
| Next by Thread: | Re: limited number if iptable rules on 64bit hosts, Bart De Schuymer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |