| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | How much ARP requests need to single IP address? |
| From: | cranium 2003 <cranium.2003@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Feb 2005 18:51:30 +0530 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=J2V4ai+DvBHX6Cle350DoAMudmZclGsOGkd7PVPG8CvcuxL3O+gJFVMo9+mjChjRxWGYbplo6ugLBf4luGNhaQpMy0JcpYnVYSgmPMDCSD5a/w4ovQ6qFkwb/xj8arY5/siL9cxGB3qpH16VHMJj7XhqNfzxJYj26S/KPM23S/M= |
| Reply-to: | cranium 2003 <cranium.2003@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello, In Linux kernel by adding debug statement i observe that if i ping to host 10.0.0.5 with 10 packets then first i know network stack require to resolve hosts IP to its Hardware ID by sending ARP on Ethernet LAN. But then what i get that if i again ping for another 10 packets to 10.0.0.5 then ARP routine is called. Why? Why linux kernel is not caching it. Infact its caching i check it in debug statements then why network stack require to resolve 10.0.0.5 host to send packets to it? Also i want to know once eth_header_cache called then all successive packet to that cache host goes directly from hh->hh_output(skb) to hard_start_xmit? regards, cranium |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Which function at link layer sends packet?, cranium 2003 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] arp_queue: serializing unlink + kfree_skb, Anton Blanchard |
| Previous by Thread: | Which function at link layer sends packet?, cranium 2003 |
| Next by Thread: | 8139too interframe gap, DataCom - Abreu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |