| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | limited number if iptable rules on 64bit hosts |
| From: | Olaf Hering <olh@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:38:51 +0100 |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt und vi sind doch schneller als Notes (und GroupWise) |
What buffer or sysctrl value has to change to allow more than 3445 rules like this (on a 64bit host with 64bit iptables)? iptables -A FORWARD -j ACCEPT setsockopt(3, SOL_IP, 0x40 /* IP_??? */, "filter\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 524368) = -1 ENOMEM (Cannot allocate memory) I see this with 2.6.5 and 2.6.11. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] prism54: use initialized current_time in debug_code, Alexey Dobriyan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: limited number if iptable rules on 64bit hosts, Olaf Hering |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |