[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch

To: rick jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:28:38 -0800
Cc: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hubert.tonneau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:19:35 -0800
rick jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx> wrote:

> How is that?  Isn't cwnd based on the ACKs the sender receives from the 
> receiver?

ACKs go from sender to receiver, first of all.

It is based upon congestion as seen "by receiver", something which is
impossible for sender.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>