| To: | Hasso Tepper <hasso@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: dummy as IMQ replacement |
| From: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:00:48 +0100 |
| Cc: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Nguyen Dinh Nam <nguyendinhnam@xxxxxxxxx>, Remus <rmocius@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andre Tomt <andre@xxxxxxxx>, syrius.ml@xxxxxxxxxx, Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Damion de Soto <damion@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200501311646.14322.hasso@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1107123123.8021.80.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200501311614.31397.hasso@xxxxxxxxx> <1107181551.7847.193.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200501311646.14322.hasso@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 04:46:14PM +0200, Hasso Tepper wrote: > This is somewhat related to killing the chance to use iptables as well ... > Iptables has better documentation and people use it just because of that. I'm afraid I have to agree on this one. The idea behind iptables is easy to grasp, whereas tc isn't totally obvious, and all tc 'tutorials' out there just give you a long list of commands to type in but don't really explain you what goes on under the hood. And you can't just expect everyone to "Go look at the source." --L |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] OpenBSD Networking-related randomization port, Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] gc_min_interval in milleseconds via /proc (fwd), Robert Olsson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |