netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] OpenBSD Networking-related randomization port

To: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OpenBSD Networking-related randomization port
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:50:25 +0100
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro <lorenzo@xxxxxxx>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Hank Leininger <hlein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <200501290915.j0T9FkVY012948@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1106932637.3778.92.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050128100229.5c0e4ea1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1106937110.3864.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050128105217.1dc5ef42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1106944492.3864.30.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1106945266.7776.41.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200501290915.j0T9FkVY012948@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 04:15:43AM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:47:45 +0100, Arjan van de Ven said:
> 
> > as for obsd_get_random_long().. would it be possible to use the
> > get_random_int() function from the patches I posted the other day? They
> > use the existing random.c infrastructure instead of making a copy...
> > 
> > I still don't understand why you need a obsd_rand.c and can't use the
> > normal random.c
> 
> Note that obsd_rand.c started off life as a BSD-licensed file - I was told
> that was a show-stopper when I submitted basically the same patch a while 
> back.
>...

At least the three clause BSD license is GPL compatible.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>