| To: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LLTX fix proposal |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:09:34 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1107142680.7847.117.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050130181854.7f088a95.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1107142423.8021.114.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1107142680.7847.117.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 30 Jan 2005 22:38:00 -0500 jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 22:33, jamal wrote: > > The tg3 you refer to in your email doesnt seem to be as bad and > > i am actually wondering why what you just posted is _the fix_ as is. > > meant is not _the fix_ It could be "_the fix_", I just don't know yet if we'll be deeply satisfied with it in the end. That's all. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?, Patrick McHardy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LLTX fix proposal, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] pktgen: proc_if_write: reduce stack usage, Randy.Dunlap |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |