Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?

["David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:58:27 +0100
Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ok, final decision: you are right :) conntrack also defragments locally
> generated packets before they hit ip_fragment. In this case the fragments
> have skb->dst set.

It's amazing how many bugs exist due to the local defragmentation and
refragmentation done by netfilter. :-)

Good catch Patrick, I'll apply this and push upstream.