netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] OpenBSD Networking-related randomization port

To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OpenBSD Networking-related randomization port
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 04:15:43 -0500
Cc: Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro <lorenzo@xxxxxxx>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Hank Leininger <hlein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:47:45 +0100." <1106945266.7776.41.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1106932637.3778.92.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050128100229.5c0e4ea1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1106937110.3864.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050128105217.1dc5ef42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1106944492.3864.30.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1106945266.7776.41.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:47:45 +0100, Arjan van de Ven said:

> as for obsd_get_random_long().. would it be possible to use the
> get_random_int() function from the patches I posted the other day? They
> use the existing random.c infrastructure instead of making a copy...
> 
> I still don't understand why you need a obsd_rand.c and can't use the
> normal random.c

Note that obsd_rand.c started off life as a BSD-licensed file - I was told
that was a show-stopper when I submitted basically the same patch a while back.

So re-working it to use get_random_int()  would be a good idea, I think....

Attachment: pgpqbn3kYhDLC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>