| To: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] OpenBSD Networking-related randomization port |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:45:19 -0800 |
| Cc: | lorenzo@xxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, chrisw@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hlein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050128133408.49021343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1106932637.3778.92.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050128100229.5c0e4ea1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1106937110.3864.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050128105217.1dc5ef42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1106944492.3864.30.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050128124517.36aa5e05.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050128133408.49021343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:34:08 -0800 Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > per-cpu would be the way to go here. Does the sbox get somehow seeded from use to use? If not, then yes that's the thing to do. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] OpenBSD Networking-related randomization port, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] OpenBSD Networking-related randomization port, Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] OpenBSD Networking-related randomization port, Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] OpenBSD Networking-related randomization port, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |