| To: | sudeep list <sudeep.list@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: turning off tcp checksums. |
| From: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:10:39 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <d50018af05012809595096dafe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Open Source Development Lab |
| References: | <d50018af05012809595096dafe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:59:31 -0700 sudeep list <sudeep.list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > hello, > > I am trying to conduct some throughput experiments using a modified > TcP/IP stack. One of the things that I would like to do is to turn off > the TcP checksum. The idea is that the application computes its own > checksum, and having tcp duplicate the effort with a weaker checksum > doesnt make sense. This still leaves the tcp header without any > checksum, but since this is a lab environment, I hope to get away with > it for now :-) Not allowed per RFC's and "forget about it", since the copy path does checksumming at almost no cost. If you still think it is a real issue then get a NIC that supports hardware checksumming. -- Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | turning off tcp checksums., sudeep list |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] OpenBSD Networking-related randomization port, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | turning off tcp checksums., sudeep list |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] OpenBSD Networking-related randomization port, Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |