netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter

To: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:10:23 -0800
Cc: kaber@xxxxxxxxx, bdschuym@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, snort2004@xxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxx, bridge@xxxxxxxx, gandalf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1106872169.18360.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1131604877.20041218092730@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <p73zn0ccaee.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1105117559.11753.34.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050107100017.454ddadc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1105133241.3375.16.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050118135735.4b77d38d.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1106433059.4486.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1106436153.20995.42.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1106484019.3376.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1106496509.1085.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050125220558.6e824f8a.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1106730510.4041.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41F82C6D.7020006@xxxxxxxxx> <20050126231801.7bf90338.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41F929FA.3050800@xxxxxxxxx> <20050127114726.2205b4ed.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41F96FA4.4000105@xxxxxxxxx> <20050127152450.6daba4fa.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1106872169.18360.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:29:29 +1100
Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> No, let's just fix them all.

In tree, yes.  But leaving the NF_HOOK()/NF_HOOK_THRESH() compat
macros in there for out-of-tree modules I feel is mandatory, it's
a major API change.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>