| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, greg@xxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [ANN] removal of certain net drivers coming soon: eepro100, xircom_tulip_cb, iph5526 |
| From: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Jan 2005 01:48:25 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <20050128001430.C22695@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <41F952F4.7040804@xxxxxxxxx> <20050127225725.F3036@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050127153114.72be03e2.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050128001430.C22695@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 12:14:30AM +0000, Russell King wrote: > The fact of the matter is that eepro100.c works on ARM, e100.c doesn't. Hmmm, I recall e100 working fine on a Radisys ENP-2611, which has a IXP2400 (xscale) in big-endian mode, running 2.6. This particular board had its root fs NFS-mounted and pumped several hundreds of gigabytes through the NIC during a period of at least a few months, and I never saw any problems. Something tells me that the next time I try it, it won't work at all. --L |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: design for TSO performance fix, Rick Jones |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ANN] removal of certain net drivers coming soon: eepro100, xircom_tulip_cb, iph5526, Russell King |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ANN] removal of certain net drivers coming soon: eepro100, xircom_tulip_cb, iph5526, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |