netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?

To: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?
From: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:03:35 +0100
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, torvalds@xxxxxxxx, alexn@xxxxxxxxx, kas@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <16888.58622.376497.380197@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20050121161959.GO3922@xxxxxxxxxx> <1106360639.15804.1.camel@boxen> <20050123091154.GC16648@xxxxxxx> <20050123011918.295db8e8.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20050123095608.GD16648@xxxxxxx> <20050123023248.263daca9.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20050123200315.A25351@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050124114853.A16971@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050125193207.B30094@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050127082809.A20510@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050127004732.5d8e3f62.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <16888.58622.376497.380197@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Oh. Linux version 2.6.11-rc2 was used.

Robert Olsson writes:
 > 
 > Andrew Morton writes:
 >  > Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 > 
 >  > >  ip_dst_cache        1292   1485    256   15    1
 > 
 >  > I guess we should find a way to make it happen faster.
 >  
 > Here is route DoS attack. Pure routing no NAT no filter.
 > 
 > Start
 > =====
 > ip_dst_cache           5     30    256   15    1 : tunables  120   60    8 : 
 > slabdata      2      2      0
 > 
 > After DoS
 > =========
 > ip_dst_cache       66045  76125    256   15    1 : tunables  120   60    8 : 
 > slabdata   5075   5075    480
 > 
 > After some GC runs.
 > ==================
 > ip_dst_cache           2     15    256   15    1 : tunables  120   60    8 : 
 > slabdata      1      1      0
 > 
 > No problems here. I saw Martin talked about NAT...
 > 
 >                                                      --ro

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>