| To: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1? |
| From: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:56:30 +0100 |
| Cc: | Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, torvalds@xxxxxxxx, alexn@xxxxxxxxx, kas@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050127004732.5d8e3f62.akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050121161959.GO3922@xxxxxxxxxx> <1106360639.15804.1.camel@boxen> <20050123091154.GC16648@xxxxxxx> <20050123011918.295db8e8.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20050123095608.GD16648@xxxxxxx> <20050123023248.263daca9.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20050123200315.A25351@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050124114853.A16971@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050125193207.B30094@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050127082809.A20510@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050127004732.5d8e3f62.akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Andrew Morton writes:
> Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > ip_dst_cache 1292 1485 256 15 1
> I guess we should find a way to make it happen faster.
Here is route DoS attack. Pure routing no NAT no filter.
Start
=====
ip_dst_cache 5 30 256 15 1 : tunables 120 60 8 :
slabdata 2 2 0
After DoS
=========
ip_dst_cache 66045 76125 256 15 1 : tunables 120 60 8 :
slabdata 5075 5075 480
After some GC runs.
==================
ip_dst_cache 2 15 256 15 1 : tunables 120 60 8 :
slabdata 1 1 0
No problems here. I saw Martin talked about NAT...
--ro
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?, Martin Josefsson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?, Robert Olsson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?, Martin Josefsson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?, Robert Olsson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |