Re: [PATCH 2.6]: keep fragment queues private to each user

netdev

Re: [PATCH 2.6]: keep fragment queues private to each user

To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH 2.6]: keep fragment queues private to each user
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:29:55 -0800
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<41F82830.9010009@xxxxxxxxx>
References:	<41F5D1CB.9050804@xxxxxxxxx> <20050125214158.4be3798c.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41F82830.9010009@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:30:56 +0100
Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Sorry, new patch attached. I'll send the 2.4 patch later tonight.

Thanks.  I'll apply this and the 2.4.x variant.

Although I have a theoretical objection to this thing.  It is
extending a namespace we have no such control over.  The namespace
is saddr/daddr/ID.  But perhaps I'm being overly anal.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH 2.6]: keep fragment queues private to each user, Patrick McHardy Re: [PATCH 2.6]: keep fragment queues private to each user, Herbert Xu Re: [PATCH 2.6]: keep fragment queues private to each user, Patrick McHardy Re: [PATCH 2.6]: keep fragment queues private to each user, Herbert Xu Re: [PATCH 2.6]: keep fragment queues private to each user, David S. Miller Re: [PATCH 2.6]: keep fragment queues private to each user, Patrick McHardy [PATCH 2.4]: keep fragment queues private to each user, Patrick McHardy Re: [PATCH 2.6]: keep fragment queues private to each user, David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [ATM] Fix flags type in lec_arp_expire_vcc, David S. Miller
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH]: was Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH 2.4]: keep fragment queues private to each user, Patrick McHardy
Next by Thread:	[PATCH] vlan: eliminate gcc warnings with PROC_FS=n, Randy.Dunlap
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]