| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] string matching ematch |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:03:23 -0800 |
| Cc: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050126150714.GL31837@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050126150714.GL31837@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:07:14 +0100 Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I'd like to discuss the string matching ematch, I don't care about the > algorithm used but rather whether to make it stateful, match over > fragments, etc. I think you'll need to make it stateful. I assume this is meant to be used for things like catching references to "Falun Gong" in SMTP sessions and stuff like that. Not that I know any entity interested in such applications :-) Anyways, if the string goes across the TCP data portion of multiple packets, statefulness becomes necessary to catch it. Right? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH][IPsec] fix process of error from crypto module, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC 2.6.10 1/22] xfrm: Add direction information to xfrm_state, David Dillow |
| Previous by Thread: | [RFC] string matching ematch, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] string matching ematch, Thomas Graf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |