| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [IPSEC] Stop using dst->xfrm |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:23:01 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050121102319.GA3160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050121102319.GA3160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:23:19 +1100 Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Here is a precursor to the xfrm dst consolidation that I talked about. > In order to be able to store multiple SAs in one dst, we need to stop > using dst->xfrm directly. > > The following patch does that for the ->output() functions. > > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I'm going to create a 2.6.12 pending queue and put this and any forthcoming xfrm dst work there. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [XFRM] Probe selected algorithm only, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/12] remove sk_protinfo series, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [IPSEC] Stop using dst->xfrm, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | on the wire behaviour of TSO on/off is supposed to be the same yes?, Rick Jones |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |