| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: skb_checksum_help |
| From: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Jan 2005 03:24:31 +0100 |
| Cc: | herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050124180354.63ae600d.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <41F50B6C.6010107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050124151510.GV23931@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050124225423.GA15405@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050124234515.GA31837@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050125000759.GA15883@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050124164049.3b939791.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050125014538.GB31837@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050125014838.GA16637@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050125020118.GC31837@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050124180354.63ae600d.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
* David S. Miller <20050124180354.63ae600d.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-01-24 18:03 > > * Herbert Xu <20050125014838.GA16637@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-01-25 12:48 > > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 02:45:38AM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > > The packets get routed back over the same physical interface. > > I think I see what is happening, it's the virtual VLAN device which > has dev->features set to zero not the acenic's netdev struct. This of course explains it, didn't think of that. I thought it would inherit the checksumming features. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: skb_checksum_help, Patrick McHardy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | accumulated net patches, Andrew Morton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: skb_checksum_help, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: skb_checksum_help, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |