Re: [PATCH 1/6] PKT_SCHED: Extended Matches API

[Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thomas Graf wrote:

> * Patrick McHardy <41F43D6D.30502@xxxxxxxxx> 2005-01-24 01:12
>  
>
> > gcc assumes likely for ptr != NULL by default. Is there a reason why a match
> > wouldn't have a match function ?
> There is no reason but ematches might get written by unexperienced people
> forgeting to register it. I know, the if partly hides the failure, it's
> one of theses case where I have the same arguments for both ways.
I don't care much, but I guess people forgetting to add a match
function to an ematch will find other ways to do stupid things :)
How about catching it in tcf_em_register ?

Regards
Patrick