Re: on the wire behaviour of TSO on/off is supposed to be the same yes?

[rick jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx>]

On Jan 21, 2005, at 8:44 PM, David S. Miller wrote:

> On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:58:47 -0800
> Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Speaking of divisor values... is zero (0) supposed to be a legal 
> > value?  The
> > sysctl seems to allow it but it does seem to behave a triffle 
> > strangely.  The
> > initial TSO size appeared to be 2MSS.
> The value "0" behaves the same as "1".
Alas I'm away from my traces at the moment, but I do recall seeing 
different behaviour with 0 than with one - with one the TSO sends 
started at 3*1448, with the divisor at zero they started at what 
appeared to be 2*1448.
I'll see if I can get to the traces before monday and send them along.

rick jones
there is no rest for the wicked, yet the virtuous have no pillows